Our Respectable Chairman (ORC)

Society is failing due to the lack of an overt authoritative power of unification. Our respectable chairman, however, possess exceptional leadership and expressed this through the defense of Lim Aik Hwee. I am surprised at the amount of which he had to say about 3 tags with infinitesimal impact on his tagboard, and even more shocked to see how seriously he regarded the matter, considering the following.

Delimitations: I am not saying that what he said was false, I'm merely rebutting his hypocritical statements.

Oh, and please don't get on about how this is a flame post. I made a special effort not to make it sound like a flame post. This means no sarcasm and no insults, according to your definition of "insult".

This is what he had to say. I also took initiative to fix some spelling errors. Do take note of the words in bold.

ClouD: yea see? proves my point. no one understands the difference between niao and insult anymore. i niaoed your actions and repeated what u said to niao u. u insulted his very existence with your post.
ClouD: notice i also didn't use words like dumb**** when i niao people. in fact. i almost never mention any names.
ClouD: cunt was the four letter words u used.
ClouD: whatever i wrote happened in real life. u insulted him based on what YOU feel. its no longer niao. its a personal attack. its an insult.

OK. Now look at what he posted on Friday July 27:

MR CHOY AKA TEH F.A.C.E

ERJIA AKA CHINA

CHIA AKA 3G aka failure. ( yes daoyi. applies for u as well)

need i explain any more? lol.

...Need I explain any more? Lol. But I can. Firstly, you mentioned 3 names there. You called Yufong what? FACE, with caps? Is it just me who thinks this way or are you "insulting" his appearance, like you do everyday in class? Calling Chia a failure? Is that not a personal attack? What makes calling people "failure" less of a personal insult that calling people "dumbcunt"? Oh, and don't bother saying "whatever I posted happened in real life", since that makes it sound more of an insult. There are much, much more of such examples lying in his archives, just that I don't really feel like.

ClouD: and hey. u see this. get irritated. and rebutt me. its not gonna end. the whole point of posting what i did was to say to be CAREFUL about ruining relationships between classmates.

Look, I am not irritated, merely amused, and do hope it ends here, but it appears that its up to you now though. We make lots of personal insults everyday, do we not? People call me black, people call me spade, are those not personal insults? And you know what, all those who have called me names never fail to return home with all limbs attached. TBH, I'd rather live in a world of insulting people than a world of nanoha.

ClouD: u're gonna study with them for the rest of this year and the next. if u dun like him. hey? by all means. go hate him. flame him on ur personal diary. just dun do stuff that might make everyone unhappy

Referring to my previous example, I don't reckon that identifying one as an underachiever gives him joy. "Ngiaoing" someone based on his looks does not bring much delight either.

ClouD: if ur unhappy with me? just tell me. i'll be very happy to take down everything thats related to u, and even post u a apology if u want.its only the fact that i think ur not that petty did i include u

Since when did you come to that? No, I dislike apology letters and thank you for knowing that I'm not petty. Of course, you're always welcome to rebut me, and I will embrace it with genocide.

ClouD: then again. u could always prove me wrong.

No, I don't assume that I've proven you wrong, since that wasn't the intention of this post in the first place. I did however, prove that you're a hypocrite.

13slc; JeR! i care. alot 炸柔! says:
do ur mum proud tony


A little bonus statement from Jerrold. Its from sometime ago.

14 comments:

  1. Unknown said,

    dumdeedumdoodledoo falalalala riding the chugga roflcopter. an age of lmaosterization

    on August 2, 2007 at 3:08 AM


  2. Unknown said,

    all this flame and hate would not be healthy if everyone takes them so seriously. just . take . a . step back . <-

    on August 2, 2007 at 3:48 AM


  3. sskyy said,

    my aim was not to flame and hate, but rather to point his hypocrisy based on his tags and blog content that he provided, which I have.

    on August 2, 2007 at 3:50 AM


  4. the_dorkly said,

    This should shut his double standard mouth up, I hope. Epic post.

    By the way, a blog is a ONLINE WEBLOG, which is equivalent to a ONLINE (personal) diary. Now hey, anyone wonders why our class's linguistic abilities rank low, low and low?

    I wonder.

    on August 2, 2007 at 3:51 AM


  5. Unknown said,

    lolol. good fight.

    on August 2, 2007 at 4:00 AM


  6. TehCca said,

    Hey, Tony I think that was too much... He was just trying to stop you from totally hurting aik hwee. TBH, though aik hwee is what you think he is, he isn't that bad after all...Learn to give and take

    on August 2, 2007 at 4:46 AM


  7. sskyy said,

    You know what, even after I made it explicitly clear in my post, I still have to repeat what I've repeated, many times.

    I've never ever disregarded his comments that I was extremely hurtful. Neither was I trying to stop him from stopping me.

    What I'm trying to say that wouldn't it be better to stop himself before stopping others?

    He has already ADMITTED to being hypocritical, and has stated that he is willing to change, and that we should change with him, and as a matter of fact, I am willing to do that.

    My post actually had some value by clarifying misconceptions.

    And what was so bad about my post? I didn't flame him did I? I was being helpful, wasn't I?

    Yet, ironic as it is, it seems that misconceptions still occur.

    Please, think before you post a comment.

    on August 2, 2007 at 4:57 AM


  8. Unknown said,

    wheee hahahaha KO!

    on August 2, 2007 at 5:44 AM


  9. Cloud said,

    we agreed that my failure to clarify the misconceptions when posting has resulted in my image in being hypocritical. my intentions were clearly different then what people felt i was trying to say.


    btw erjia.

    u got it right. its an ONLINE weblog. Online = public. which is why its dangerous. u can flame anyone as much as u want in a book of your own.cause no one will see it. but ur blog is something everyone will see. its exactly cause people are careless did people who posted racist remarks and many more get sued.

    and i wonder why u're feeling so targeted by my post...i didnt say anything about u...i mean. tony had the right to feel targeted cause i put there e.g. tony. but you? why so defensive..? perhaps...

    on August 2, 2007 at 7:49 AM


  10. Cloud said,

    but yea. i guess i also did let lose a few words like face every now and then. thing is, im willing to watch my mouth, but are you?

    on August 2, 2007 at 7:55 AM


  11. the_dorkly said,

    You do know that my blog hasn't displayed it's true flammatory content yet because I only flamed one guy from 3E right? I'm not planning to do anything atm although people are bugging me to do a post on Aik Hwee eh? So yeah.

    But to your point - a weblog is indeed public; thats the point of it! I don't want my blog and its contents to be strictly for myself: the purpose of it is to humiliate people who deserve, and I stress the word deserve to be humiliated. I don't go around flaming people I don't like - hell, if so I would have countless posts.

    I assume that I would not be punished for the contents on my blog, but even if I did - it will be suicide for those who try to accuse me of that.

    on August 2, 2007 at 8:04 AM


  12. sskyy said,

    Man you guys are lame.

    Maybe its cause you don't watch any anime >_>.

    on August 2, 2007 at 9:22 AM


  13. Cloud said,

    bleach and naruto rocks. but they only come out ONCE A WEEK. most other animes are stupid. of course. u will beg to differ. but seriously. like inuyasha. wa lau. the starting is like freaking lame can?

    erjia: ok. i shall not continue this anymore. or then it will be truely ironic im arguing that we should not argue.

    on August 2, 2007 at 9:29 AM


  14. sskyy said,

    Please watch more current series inuyasha is like 10 years ago.

    on August 2, 2007 at 3:03 PM